Once you have made a decision, create a dedicated page for it.
Keicho seems to have a great compatibility.
Thinking about TOK with Keicho
- Simplify the following questions:
Questions:
-
When separating between accepted and disputed, determining the range of people to include as judges becomes a challenging issue.
- If conspiracy theories are only judged by believers, it becomes accepted knowledge.
-
What is meant by a “clear line”?
- It is a definition that sets the range of people who accept or dispute.
- If something strange is said, the clear line itself can also be accepted or disputed.
- It can be said that the clear line itself is knowledge that can be accepted or disputed.
- Infinite loop.
-
What is meant by “direct experience”?
- The problem is that experiences tend to provide more information than knowledge and can influence emotions, making it problematic.
-
“Deceptive” assumes there is a correct answer.
-
What does “obvious” mean?
- There are various types, such as the original obvious based on authority or faith, sense perception or experience, and logic.
-
What is a “systematic process”?
- Is it something with a defined order?
- Like in trials, or training animals, etc.
-
What does “all” mean?
-
What is meant by “provisional”?
- Knowledge about the past or future is provisional.
- Assumptions that are unstable are provisional.
- In science: the assumption that there are universal and immutable laws in time/space.
-
What criteria determine “enough”?
- In statistical knowledge production, a line like 98% is set to define “enough.”
-
Can we question the statement “rarely completely certain” in the first half, as it seems to have an assumption-like quality?
- Well, it’s probably fine.
- In mathematics, one could say “always certain,” as anything can be certain once defined.
- Mathematical predictions are not certain, but whether predictions can be considered knowledge is a point of argument.
- Or rather, is there no mention of “knowledge”?