-
I am too ignorant about philosophical terms.
-
So, for now, I think I’ll grasp the overall picture with this and then read more specialized books on epistemology and metaphysics.
-
I will write down some light notes below, and if it becomes too bulky, I will create another page.
- Since I really don’t know anything, I think there are many mistakes and strange points in the notes below (disclaimer).
-
Relativism (Humans are the measure of all things)
- I thought that ethical views, for example, are not only relative to each individual but also relative to time.
- They are different from last night and from myself in five years.
- I think I have a strong inclination towards relativism within myself.
- Criticism of relativism
-
“No proposition is absolutely true.”
- Then, isn’t the statement above also not absolutely true? It’s a self-contradiction.
-
- I thought that ethical views, for example, are not only relative to each individual but also relative to time.
-
- I wondered what virtue is, but I thought it means “something that leads to Happiness” and defined it as such.
- Is it about acquiring knowledge about something that makes me feel happy?
- But does Socrates consider goodness as something universal?
- If we consider the unity of knowledge and virtue based on relativism, it might lead to the kind of thinking mentioned above.
-
- Similar to Affordance
-
- “The Idea of Good is the highest Idea.”
- What is the highest Idea? (Highest in terms of what criteria?)
- Plato seems to have regarded Ideas as absolute (unchanging), but I feel like Ideas are just “definitions” that humans possess.
- If that’s the case, it also changes the idea that there exists an absolute good (Idea of Good).
-
- The idea of separating the mind (self) from the body.
- This can be extended quite a bit with modern technology.
- Self <- written here
In modern times, British Empiricism vs Continental Rationalism
-
This is really interesting.
-
There are no Primary Qualities, and everything is based on human perception.#secondaryqualities#britishempiricism
- The existence of an apple only exists in the human mind.
- It is simply interpreted as such because we perceive it that way.
- This connects to the idea that Time Does Not Exist and that thermodynamics is created by the “ambiguous eyes” and ambiguous perception of humans.
-
It is also the same idea that we cannot reach Kant’s Thing-in-itself.
- 12 categories of Understanding
- Copernican turn
-
Kant’s three books
- Critique of Pure Reason: Epistemology
- Critique of Practical Reason: Ethics
- Critique of Judgment: Aesthetics
- Critique does not mean negation but has the same meaning as critics in English.#criticalphilosophy
-
When studying philosophy, pay attention to Language
-
Difference between what is considered Science and what is not: Not based on what can be verified, but on falsifiability#tok
-
- I feel a sense of discomfort about this.
- The reason for the existence of a human being is that the intention of the parent exists, and it can be identified with other things.
- The difference between humans and other things is that they change afterwards, but there are other things that change randomly after being born.
- This leads to the debate of whether consciousness and freedom exist.
-
- It feels like a negation of the discussion I wrote about in Politics
-
- It connects with Social Brain
- Seeing the brain <—> limbs and the brain <—> external objects in the same way
There is a sequel, so please give it a read! (takker)
- It covers Chinese and Japanese philosophy, analytical philosophy, and other topics.
- I read it briefly at the library 🙌(blu3mo)I also recommend reading “Ethics” by Tokyo Shoseki to deepen your understanding! (takker)
- I also recommend “Glossary of Ethics Terms”! (blu3mo)