• In Techniques for Intellectual Production, it was simply introduced as “Cards,” but for distinction, let’s call it Kyoto University-style Cards.

  • Unlike Notes, you can rearrange the order.

    • Rearrange to find relationships or classify
      • Scrapbox-like idea (reverse order)
    • While notes allow only two-dimensional movement, I think the ability to move in two dimensions with cards is also important (blu3mo).
    • Connects to KJ Method.
  • Accumulate thoughts from various genres.

  • There is also the intention of standardization.

    • Sticking one’s own thoughts, images, newspapers, etc., on paper of the same size.
    • This is also Scrapbox-like.
  • [/shokai/Not turning dead text into a warehouse](https://scrapbox.io/shokai/Not turning dead text into a warehouse)#dead text

    • There was a similar discussion to this.
    • In a format where you cannot rearrange like a note, text dies.
  • The method of my current class [Notes] also feels similar.

    • However, I don’t rearrange.
    • Because I am learning systematically, for school studies, frequent rearranging ability is not necessary.
    • Knowledge that I want to handle systematically is in goodnotes, and knowledge I want to handle like cards is in Scrapbox.

image

  • Ordered by Tadao Umesao himself.

    • There are struggles from the analog era.
  • Negative opinion:

    • When you express thoughts on cards, the quantity of your own thinking is materialized.
      • In your mind, it feels like there are infinite thoughts expanding, but those limits are visualized in material form.
  • Feeling the Tangible nature of thought.

    • Not necessarily tangible, just analog.
    • Adding digital elements to cards, trying out “Tangible thinking”#idea
      • Being able to physically manipulate the content of Scrapbox or your own tweets.