-
I don’t quite understand it.
- I’m slightly avoiding it because it feels like a buzzword similar to SDGs.
- I see (takker) (nishio)
-
I was wondering what to name the generation after Z, and it seems that those born in 2010 and later are called the Alpha Generation.
- Is that okay? LOL
-
Is it a characteristic to open up various things in a closed context? (I read something like that somewhere)
- Like Zenly, or private account social networks
- In that sense, is Scrapbox Limited Public Operation also “Z-generation-like”?
It bothers me that people who are not sure if they can be grouped together are being simplified under the label of the Z generation. It is common to categorize things with differences as the same using a single word, and this seems to be one of those phenomena.
- It’s easier cognitively to ignore differences and treat things as the same.
- The same thing was written two years ago: 5f6d470379e113000060860f Main Subject is Big
I think that the talk of “young people these days” has been repeated since ancient times, and it’s just being presented as if it’s a bit smarter (nishio).
- In the engineering community, there is another way of saying it like the Nanaroku Generation.
- I think it’s much more rational than Z or Alpha.
- Entrepreneurship Boom Again! What’s Interesting about the “81st Generation” - Interview with YJ Capital COO Takuo Ozawa | Startup | Toyo Keizai Online
- “86th Generation” Talks about the Dawn of SNS. Conversation between Masahiko Katuse and Yuuta Iita#theprofessional | SNS Column |#hotlink
- Focusing on specific years is indeed much more limited than grouping them as young people (takker) Young People Nowadays
I wonder who started using this word in the first place (takker). Well, I don’t think there’s any profit in knowing that.