-
[Funding the Commons (FtC) Tokyo Preparation in Japan](https://scrapbox.io/tkgshn/Funding the Commons(FtC)Tokyo 日本開催に向けて)
-
Contemplating whether to attend:
- If you’re a student, you can apply for a scholarship here to attend for free.
- Oh, I didn’t know that (takker).
-
I don’t feel like this event is a perfect fit for me.
- I haven’t been particularly interested or passionate about funding [Public Goods].
-
Well, in a context like [202312 Life Consideration: Business vs Research], I do feel it could be relevant to me in the future.
-
The discussions will probably be interesting, and I might attend to broaden my horizons.
- I want to make sure to prepare adequately.
-
Proceeding with registration.
-
If you are applying for a ticket scholarship, please tell us your reason for requesting this ticket tier in order to be considered for approval.
- What should I write?
- Well, maybe I’ll write about the value/contribution I can bring by participating.
-
- Approval granted! (tkgshn)
- Thank you (blu3mo).
-
-
Interesting activities:
- [Intellectual Property Encyclopedia]
- Missed the session but very interested.
- [Academist]
- [Intellectual Property Encyclopedia]
Audrey + Taka + Tasaka
- Funding for science research to be more dynamic.
- What does dynamic mean? Being agile and flexible, projects that don’t pass review will disappear.
- QF
- Starting from small experiments.
- Infrastructure vs. nature.
- Governance vs. execution.
- Not very clear about the former. Deciding whether to make decisions beyond precedent or just execute as usual.
- Link to website
- Not just a QF, they have set upper and lower limits.
- Using [SDGs] as the definition of public goods.
- It’s convenient to use as a consensus for “good things.”
- Future of the government.
- It’s better to have retrospective funding based on gaining people’s support, rather than just government relationships.
- Constraints are defined by relationships with people, not the government (blu3mo).
- It’s better to have retrospective funding based on gaining people’s support, rather than just government relationships.
Plurality is more like a toolkit than a single solution.