• [Funding the Commons (FtC) Tokyo Preparation in Japan](https://scrapbox.io/tkgshn/Funding the Commons(FtC)Tokyo 日本開催に向けて)

  • A Rich 2-Day Event Paving the Future of Digital Public Goods - Funding the Commons Tokyo 2024 | Hal Seki

  • Contemplating whether to attend:

    • If you’re a student, you can apply for a scholarship here to attend for free.
    • Oh, I didn’t know that (takker).
  • I don’t feel like this event is a perfect fit for me.

    • I haven’t been particularly interested or passionate about funding [Public Goods].
  • Well, in a context like [202312 Life Consideration: Business vs Research], I do feel it could be relevant to me in the future.

  • The discussions will probably be interesting, and I might attend to broaden my horizons.

    • I want to make sure to prepare adequately.
  • Proceeding with registration.

    • If you are applying for a ticket scholarship, please tell us your reason for requesting this ticket tier in order to be considered for approval.

      • What should I write?
      • Well, maybe I’ll write about the value/contribution I can bring by participating.
    • image
      • Approval granted! (tkgshn)
      • Thank you (blu3mo).
  • Interesting activities:

    • [Intellectual Property Encyclopedia]
      • Missed the session but very interested.
    • [Academist]

Audrey + Taka + Tasaka

  • Funding for science research to be more dynamic.
  • What does dynamic mean? Being agile and flexible, projects that don’t pass review will disappear.
  • QF
    • Starting from small experiments.
  • Infrastructure vs. nature.
  • Governance vs. execution.
    • Not very clear about the former. Deciding whether to make decisions beyond precedent or just execute as usual.
  • Link to website
    • Not just a QF, they have set upper and lower limits.
    • Using [SDGs] as the definition of public goods.
      • It’s convenient to use as a consensus for “good things.”
  • Future of the government.
    • It’s better to have retrospective funding based on gaining people’s support, rather than just government relationships.
      • Constraints are defined by relationships with people, not the government (blu3mo).

Plurality is more like a toolkit than a single solution.