-
It is discussing a more general topic than just the professional ethics of engineers.
- Good point (blu3mo)(blu3mo)
-
- He talks about the harmony of the soul with the idea of goodness.
- I can’t really agree with that.
- Hmm, I don’t understand how it can be implemented.
- Also, it contradicts the assumption of absolute justice in the argument.
- In another source, there is also the claim that it refers to something that can be agreed upon.
- In terms of artificial reality, justice collapses (blu3mo).
- He talks about the harmony of the soul with the idea of goodness.
-
- He criticizes Plato and says that there are various goods in each case.
- Isn’t this relativism? He claims that there is a unique good in each case.
- That good is achieving the “purpose” in that case.
- Teleology, judging goodness based on results.
- The purpose of humans = good is happiness.
- This seems to have utilitarianism in it? (blu3mo)
- Virtue ethics
- This becomes more about personal ethics, so it seems less relevant to the argument (blu3mo).
- He criticizes Plato and says that there are various goods in each case.
-
- Deontological ethics
- Only the intention of an action becomes the basis of goodness.
- Intent is more important than the outcome.
- Definition of “rightness”
- Ah
-
Chapter 9
-
/tkgshn-private/Responsibility of Scientists(tkgshn)
- Is it related?