Structure Proposal ver.2
-
First, provide definitions.
-
Start by discussing Is Virtual Reality “Evil”?.
- Critically analyze and clarify the evaluation criteria based on the previous discussion.
- Reach conclusions for each evaluation criterion, such as “good” or “challenges.”
-
Then, address the remaining issues.
- If we adopt the evaluation criteria of Is Virtual Reality “Evil”?, the moral responsibility of artificial creators becomes a focal point.
- Connect this with meta discussions and provide real-life examples of negative consequences related to capitalism.
- If other evaluation criteria can be identified, discuss them as well.
- Begin with the technology itself.
- If we adopt the evaluation criteria of Is Virtual Reality “Evil”?, the moral responsibility of artificial creators becomes a focal point.
Structure Proposal ver.1
-
Is the “Metaverse” a “Dystopia”? - Normative discussions on a diverse reality.
-
Motivation
- Frustration with the vague concept of the “Metaverse” and the tendency for it to be criticized based on ambiguous evaluation criteria.
-
What do we want to achieve?
- Aim for clarity, but be prepared to abandon it if it seems impossible (blu3mo).
- However, if the content becomes stagnant, it may be necessary to introduce new ideas to keep it interesting, as long as time constraints allow.
- Aim for clarity, but be prepared to abandon it if it seems impossible (blu3mo).
-
Definition of the Metaverse
- While there are various aspects, we want to focus on the aspect of a diverse reality.
- Definition: ~~~
- Specifically, ~~~
- It is important to have a shared understanding of this specific image.
- This definition also includes concepts such as filter bubbles.
- Specifically, ~~~
-
Definition of Norms
- It is better to consider the discussion and approach it from a bottom-up perspective.
-
Framework for the discussion
- If we introduce futuristic technologies, we can solve anything.
- We want to define constraints that make the discussion meaningful.
- If we introduce futuristic technologies, we can solve anything.
-
Discussions that cannot reach consensus without shared reality.
-
Freedom-related discussions
- Since artificial objects serve as membranes for information, someone will inevitably be in control, which may be undesirable.
- Network effects, for example.
- Discussions like The Turing Trap: The Promise & Peril of Human-Like Artificial Intelligence - Stanford Digital Economy Lab.
- Centralization resulting from increased mobility and ease of use.
- But there is also decentralization, right?
- However, that’s just idealism, and ultimately, ~~~.
- We want to logically pursue the evaluation criteria we have defined.
- Since artificial objects serve as membranes for information, someone will inevitably be in control, which may be undesirable.
-
Discussing broadly on each evaluation criterion seems challenging.
-