Subjective Perception of Reality

• The title is temporary, and I’m looking for the actual name commonly used.

• It doesn’t matter if experiences or whatever are Truth or not, as long as you can believe in them even if they might be fake. That’s the underlying idea.

  • Originally, the title of this page was Believability doctrine.
    • It changed because it became a broader discussion.

• Expanding on this, it seems to relativize the concept of reality itself.

  • A technology that diminishes the shared reality of absolute reality and allows each person to live in their own joyful reality.
  • I’m very interested in this (Things I’m Interested In).
  • I want to address the ethics of this in Baji Seminar Essay 1S Semester.

• In 62977a7579e113000027570d, it is expressed as “parallel reality.”

• Or rather, I’m not interested in reality becoming multi-dimensional, but I’m interested in treating what is generally considered fiction on an equal level as reality (blu3mo).

  • In that sense, it can still be called Believability doctrine.

• I want to know the name (blu3mo).

  • It’s Nice to Know the Names Already Attached to Concepts

• I threw it out on Discord/Twitter and got various responses, thanks. Classically, it would be around here (blu3mo):

• Idealism,

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_idealism
    • Vasubandhu, Berkeley,
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_idealism
    • Hegel
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_idealism
    • Kant

• Yuishiki

  • Vasubandhu

• @blu3mo: I’m very interested in the worldview that “the ‘world’ is nothing more than a complex of parallel realities” and I’m looking for a name for it (if there is one, I’d like to know) https://t.co/eMhCPdlbaW

  • @GentaGame

  • Is it something like Yukuskyur’s Ringworld…?

  • (The perspective might be slightly different though)

    • This might be it (blu3mo)(blu3mo)

  • @yunoLv3: @blu3mo It seems like Social Constructionism (in the sense that each person is different, similar to the concept of a ringworld or the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?). At least, there seems to be something in the lineage of linguistic theory.

    • Is it the same as Social Constructivism?
      • The social constructivism I know seems to have a strong context of Science and Technology Studies.
    • Why the lineage of linguistic theory?

  • Something similar has been happening in psychology recently, so this area might be good.

  • https://t.co/Q3WQJTfW2t

  • https://t.co/yGpCeC6UOr

    • Looks interesting (blu3mo)

  • @mariaoyama: New Realism by Markus Gabriel? https://t.co/EgNy9i7xbW

    • A contemporary philosopher.
    • I don’t understand anything.
      • At times like this, I want to quickly build a foundation of knowledge/mental map of Modern thought so that I can understand the content (blu3mo)(blu3mo)(blu3mo)

  • If Blu3mo eventually arrives at the question of “what is the nature of realism or reality, and how do they arise” (and if you want to describe it in a scientific worldview), I think it’s good to skim through the principle of free energy.

  • Unified Theory of the Brain: What Is It? (岩波科学ライブラリー 299) https://amzn.asia/d/1SS70QT

  • Image

  • I feel like most of reality (whether it’s perception, cognition, or social norms) can be explained by “expectations ≒ predictions and surprises” about the world.

  • What is “Transcendental Realism”? The Realistic Turn Brought by Meillassoux | What Philosophers are Thinking Now | Diamond Online Transcendental Realism - Wikipedia

• (rickshinmi)It might be close

The Day Search Disappears