-
Gender is considered “performative.”
- The understanding that gender is something consciously performed or done is incorrect.
- Gender is not something that exists as a characteristic but rather something that manifests through actions.
- It is not about having a core essence of gender, but rather gender is created through unconscious or conscious habitual behaviors.
- Additionally, how others perceive and recognize gender based on these performances is also a factor.
- This aligns with the concept of social constructivism.
- Q. What about individuals who identify as a certain gender but do not express it through their actions?
- This is a debatable topic.
-
Instead of trying to understand everything, let’s extract the parts that can be used for an essay from the class discussions.
-
There is a mention of hooks, so it might be useful.
- Points of intersection with hooks:
- The difference in perspectives, which can be directly applied to one’s own object of study.
- The existence of “real love.”
- References to pages 86 and 92.
- The connection between Livingston and lesbianism.
- The identificatory bond with being gay on page 93.
- The act of directing the camera as an expression of love.
- The camera makes realness feel real.
- The presence of Livingston’s lesbian desire.
- Mentioned on page 93.
- The idea that Livingston’s femininity does not appear in the film.
- Points of intersection with hooks:
-
I also want to explore the layer of “what it means to operate a camera” in my UW Essay #2 (blu3mo).
-
I don’t fully understand the meaning of “de-naturalization of the norm” mentioned on page 88, so I would like to discuss it during office hours (blu3mo)(blu3mo)(blu3mo).
-
Topics to consider: class, race, gender
-
Concepts: hegemony, oppression
- Resistance
-
Subversion
-
Ideal
-
Discussion on the realness of fantasy
- The performances by queens
-
Denaturalizing the belief that gender comes from sex
-
How to deal with hegemonic norms
-
Hooks