-
GDC
- When finding an area, it is easier to draw a graph than to input it into the calculator.
- When solving simultaneous equations, it is much easier and more reliable to use the calculator’s functions.
- When finding d/dx=0, it is better to rely on the calculator instead of calculating it seriously.
-
IBMathP1
- It is not advisable to dwell on difficult problems even if there is some extra time.
- If you can’t figure out a problem after thinking about it for a while, it’s better to skip it and come back to it later. Often, ideas come to mind when time is left.
-
IBMathP2
- Since there is not much time, it is important to solve problems quickly and efficiently.
- Pay attention to the keyword “exact”. If it is mentioned, using the GDC is not allowed.
-
IBMathP3
- This is a new format.
- It is the most enjoyable to solve.
- Time is quite tight.
- In the first attempt, it’s okay to not be able to solve some questions.
- Focus on speed rather than the rigor of the answers.
- Points to note:
- Unless it is a proof question, there is no need to explain rigorously.
- There is no need to explicitly mention the sides of a triangle, for example.
- The stance seems to be that as long as the necessary equations are present, the answer is okay.
- On the contrary, it seems better to write the equations in more detail if possible.
- For example, x/2=a, x=2a, with that level of detail if there is time.
- If you are not sure how much to write, it is better to focus on fewer words and more equations.
- Unless it is a proof question, there is no need to explain rigorously.
- Tips for solving the last question:
- If you don’t understand, make sure to check the given conditions.
-
Tips for answering:
- It is not necessary to break down the calculation process into too much detail.
- It seems that what matters is showing a relationship between something using equations.
- Be aware of the score and check if the solution is really correct.
- Especially for probability problems, if the solution is too simple for a 6-point problem, it should be doubted.
-
Study plan:
- Start by practicing topics that you are unsure about to resolve any doubts.
- After that, solve many IBMathP3 problems.
- It requires the most practice, can be done in a short time, and is relatively enjoyable.
-
Topics of concern:
- Vectors:
- Lack of practice is the main reason for difficulty.
- Probability:
- If you can remember what you learned in the past, it should be okay.
- Difficult integrals:
- Lack of practice.
- Vectors:
-
Exam preparation:
- Q. I found past papers of “Further Mathematics HL” and “Mathematics HL”, which should I use to prepare for Math AA HL?
-
Mostly Math HL. Some question types might be found in Further math.
-
For example integration by parts, Maclaurin series, and differential equations.
-
Review and practice the material covered since the end of 11th grade:
- To do:
- Solve any problems from the textbook that have been moved.
- Kognity’s exam style questions.
- Topics covered:
- Oblique functions and statistics.
- Calculus.
- Thoughts (only important ones):
- Statistics: I’m afraid of making small mistakes.
- It might be helpful to be able to intuitively understand variance by looking at tables.
- I’m starting to understand how to use the calculator.
- Naming variables when creating tables, for example:
- Since using x or y can cause conflicts, use the initials of nouns. Use two characters to represent square, and use f as the initial of frequency.
- Naming variables when creating tables, for example:
- Statistics: I’m afraid of making small mistakes.
- To do:
-
Common writing mistakes:
- In integration, the lack of writing intermediate steps makes it confusing.
- Especially for integration by parts, it seems better to learn how to create tables.
- Often make the mistake of multiplying coefficients twice, be careful.
- In integration, the lack of writing intermediate steps makes it confusing.
- Memo to future self for exam preparation:
- It might be important to be able to predict how partial points are awarded based on the questions.
- Especially for Mathematical Induction, it would be sad not to pick up all the points.
- It would be good to list the necessary items.
- Especially for Mathematical Induction, it would be sad not to pick up all the points.
- Write the solutions to proof questions neatly.
- Even if it’s not too elaborate, I don’t want to have arrows connecting messy steps.
- I haven’t had the consciousness to write it neatly at all, but I think that as long as I have that consciousness, I can reach a level where it’s not a problem (blu3mo).- Numbering the equations may prevent confusion with arrows (takker)
- Add or at the end
- Refer to them as “substituting into ,” “differentiating both sides of ,” “from ,” etc. when using them
- It might be important to be able to predict how partial points are awarded based on the questions.
- I want to confirm if using my own style of mathematical induction is acceptable for the actual exam
- Is “P(n) is true” the correct notation?
- I think it’s fine (takker)
- If you want to make it more mathematical, maybe use
- If using symbols from proof theory, it would be , but some teachers may not understand it
- So, maybe is the safest option?
- I’m quite worried about the topics after the final midterm, so I want to study them properly during the summer break
- Especially the topic of Integration