from Introduction to Human Behavior at the University of Tokyo History of Psychology
- Wundt (founder of psychology in Germany)
- Wanted to understand consciousness
- Approach: Elementism (Structuralism) and Introspection
- Elementism:
- Basically, breaking consciousness down into parts and revealing their combinations
- I also had this image, but on the other hand, what else is there? (blu3mo)
- Is consciousness a complex of the five senses and simple emotions (pleasure/displeasure, excitement/calmness, tension/relaxation)?
- Well, this model seems too simple from a modern perspective
- Basically, breaking consciousness down into parts and revealing their combinations
- Introspection
- Introspection: Subjects reporting their thoughts
- Tried to conduct experiments and be scientific
- However, there were inherent limitations to objective observation, so introspection (listening to what subjects had to say) became more common
- But that’s not really ideal, right? (blu3mo)
- However, there were inherent limitations to objective observation, so introspection (listening to what subjects had to say) became more common
- Psychology developed by criticizing Wundt
- Similar to what we often see in philosophy (blu3mo)(blu3mo)
- Gestalt psychology
- Criticized elementism
-
The whole is not the sum of its parts
- Huh? (blu3mo)
- The most important thing is not the individual elements, but the whole (consciousness) that emerges from their combination
- The claim is that we should focus on the overall phenomena (consciousness) that arise from the combination of elements, rather than understanding each element individually
- A warning against reducing everything to simple elements (Reductionism)
- I see~ (blu3mo)(blu3mo)
- However, well, Germany was heavily affected by WW1/WW2, so it didn’t gain much momentum
- Instead, the center of psychology (or rather, science) shifted to the United States
- Behaviorism in the United States
- Criticized introspection
- J.B. Watson
-
Psychology must be a science!
- Science is based on objective data
- But introspection is not at all objective
- Emphasized the relationship between stimulus and response
- Something that Wundt also wanted to do but couldn’t
- However, this is an incomplete view of science from a modern perspective
- It’s not just about objectivity (directly observable things), and science doesn’t require it to be present or absent
- Science has evolved through various efforts~ (blu3mo)
- It’s not just about objectivity (directly observable things), and science doesn’t require it to be present or absent
- Modern times
- Neo-behaviorism
- Classical behaviorism: Stimulus -> Response
- Neo-behaviorism: Stimulus -> Organism -> Response
- By considering the mechanisms of organisms, we can understand more things by doing behaviorism, right? (blu3mo)
- Neo-behaviorism