I want to fully understand the model of Communication Theory/Communication by Schramm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schramm’s_model_of_communication
Original text:
195X How communication works
- https://www.worldradiohistory.com/BOOKSHELF-ARH/Education/The-Process-and-Effects-of-Mass-Communication-Schramm-1960.pdf#page=12.30 Schramm, W. (1971). The Nature of Communication between Humans. In W. Schramm, & D. F. Roberts (Eds.), The Process and Effects of Mass Communication (pp. 3-516). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
First, I’ll digest the information from Wikipedia.
The success of communication depends on the participants’ realm of experience. This realm includes past life experiences, attitudes, and beliefs. It influences how the processes of encoding, decoding, and interpretation are carried out.
- It seems to be carrying on the discussion that was attributed to Weaver, and it’s good that it touches on errors in the process.
Schramm argues that senders usually have goals they want to achieve through communication.
-
It feels like a simplified model.
-
In context, it’s a response to Weaver’s model, not likely to be linear.
-
It also discusses the correspondence between symbols and meanings.
He advocates for the creation of shared experiential spaces that function as a background for communication.
-
I’m not sure yet how to incorporate this concept (blu3mo).
- Traditionally, communication required shared experiences, but this can be mediated by LLM, which is a joyful claim.
- However, there’s more to it than just that.
- Traditionally, communication required shared experiences, but this can be mediated by LLM, which is a joyful claim.
-
Each participant has their own realm of experience. It determines how the processes of encoding, decoding, and interpretation take place.
- The idea that these processes vary among individuals can be quite useful.
Conditions for successful communication
- Ah, this part can be partially altered, can’t it?
- In fact, it can be entirely altered.