(public)
- Sharing a sense of time with others is one way to enhance the feeling of immersion in a timeline.
- Axes for immersion
 - There is no need to actually share it, Believability
 
 
- Now there are contents that allow creators’ timeline to match the viewers’ timeline axokxi
 
A discussion I had around July 2020 #Time
- 
In relation to#kineto, what does it mean to truly manipulate time?
- 
In the context of Communication, what is the sense of “Sense of Time Sharing”?
 - 
To summarize:
- The feeling of “sharing time” is a one-sided sensation for the recipient of information.
- It is felt when experiencing something (such as video or reality) that is the same as the information sender.
 
 - Face-to-face conversations, Zoom, and comments on Nico Nico Douga, fundamentally have no major differences when viewed in this way.
- [* The difference lies in the delay from when the information is sent to when it is received, whether it is 1ms, 0.5 seconds, or 1 year.]
 
 
 - The feeling of “sharing time” is a one-sided sensation for the recipient of information.
 - 
When receiving information from X while co-experiencing with X, it feels like “sharing time.”
- 
X refers to:
- The person you are conversing with (usually a human).
 
 - 
The exchanged information includes:
- Voice messages
 - Reactions through facial expressions
 - And various other forms
 
 - 
The “something” that is co-experienced with X refers to something that changes over time (affected by the value of t).
- In the case of face-to-face conversations in reality:
- It is the “reality experienced through the five senses.”
- A clock is a tool used to measure it with a certain scale.
 
 
 - It is the “reality experienced through the five senses.”
 - In the case of comments on Nico Nico Douga or kineto:
- It is the “video” that is co-experienced.
- Here, the seek bar is a tool used to measure it with a certain scale.
 
 
 - It is the “video” that is co-experienced.
 - What about Zoom?
- It is the “sound of your own voice” that is co-experienced.
- You cannot directly perceive that you are co-experiencing your own voice.
 - However, you can indirectly feel it because the other person is responding based on what you said.
 
 
 - It is the “sound of your own voice” that is co-experienced.
 
 - In the case of face-to-face conversations in reality:
 - 
Communication from X is generally one-way.
- The information is sent from X before it is received, in terms of physical time.
- “Before” can be 1ms ago, 1 year ago, or anything in between.
- 1ms = the delay for the sound waves in a conversation to reach the other person.
 - 300ms = the delay in a conversation on Zoom.
 - 1 year = the delay when viewing old comments on Nico Nico Douga.
 
 
 - “Before” can be 1ms ago, 1 year ago, or anything in between.
 
 - The information is sent from X before it is received, in terms of physical time.
 - 
In other words, the feeling of “sharing time” is a one-way emotion (true “sharing” is not actually happening).
- From your perspective, you are sharing time with X.
 - But from X’s perspective, there is a possibility that they are not “sharing time” with you.
 
 - 
Why is it possible to have two-way conversations in face-to-face interactions or on Zoom?
- Because the time between sending information and receiving a response from the other person is within an acceptable range.
 - If the delay is within a certain threshold, both parties can feel that they are “sharing time” and engage in two-way conversations.
 
 - 
The use of the word “sharing” is because in traditional communication, the difference is only at the level of being able to have two-way conversations.
- It is not truly “sharing.”
 - I am looking for a better vocabulary, but it hasn’t come to me yet.
 
 
 - 
 - 
The factors that influence the degree of the sensation of “sharing time” are:
- There are several barriers
- Interactive touch, interactive video, conversation, etc. each have their own barriers drinami
 
 
 - There are several barriers
 
 - 
 - 
The following are miscellaneous thoughts in the thought process
- 
Q: Is it unnecessary to consider macro-level time (e.g., several years)?
- Physically, the macro-level differences in communication only occur at the cosmic level.
 - Well, but ニコニコ動画_2 and others communicate on a scale of several years.
 
 - 
A: In other words, whether it is macro or micro is irrelevant; only the before and after of physical time matters.
 - 
We can ignore the discussion of the speed of time in relativity theory.- In communication, the physical body of “others” is also flowing time for oneself.
 
 - 
 - 
However, their way of thinking can be helpful, like the communication in [Interstellar].
- That is actually a form of communication without any distortion, so wouldn’t it be helpful to reference it?