• It’s like sharing the knowledge that someone else has shared in your own words.

  • Recently, I’ve been wondering if this is okay or not.

    • Well, I wouldn’t say I’m worried, but it’s been on my mind lately.
  • (The text is from Notion)

    • Of course, directly copying a text is not good, but I don’t think there’s a problem with rewriting and publishing what you’ve read in your own words (takker).
      • For example, yosider adds “from Developmental Disability Survival Guide” at the end of the page.
  • In the academic world, not citing sources is not acceptable.

    • Well, that’s obvious.
  • As long as no one is bothered by it, it’s fine to do this in a non-academic world.

    • It can be said that if the original knowledge was shared as “everyone’s,” then no one would be bothered.
    • It’s just contributing to the dissemination of information.

(takker)

  • When you know where the knowledge comes from,

    • I think it’s important to clearly indicate which literature or whose words it is.
    • Any method of indicating is fine, like the occasional “from xxx” that you see on Scrapbox.
    • By doing so, people who see it can easily trace the source.
    • It’s considerate to both yourself and others.
  • When you don’t even know whose words they are,

    • If you want to do it properly, you should write something like “I heard from someone that xxx,” but well, that’s a hassle.
  • Personally, I was wondering how much I can summarize information from books.

  • Mentioned links: