-
It’s like sharing the knowledge that someone else has shared in your own words.
-
Recently, I’ve been wondering if this is okay or not.
- Well, I wouldn’t say I’m worried, but it’s been on my mind lately.
-
(The text is from Notion)
- Of course, directly copying a text is not good, but I don’t think there’s a problem with rewriting and publishing what you’ve read in your own words (takker).
- For example, yosider adds “from Developmental Disability Survival Guide” at the end of the page.
- Of course, directly copying a text is not good, but I don’t think there’s a problem with rewriting and publishing what you’ve read in your own words (takker).
-
In the academic world, not citing sources is not acceptable.
- Well, that’s obvious.
-
As long as no one is bothered by it, it’s fine to do this in a non-academic world.
- It can be said that if the original knowledge was shared as “everyone’s,” then no one would be bothered.
- It’s just contributing to the dissemination of information.
(takker)
-
When you know where the knowledge comes from,
- I think it’s important to clearly indicate which literature or whose words it is.
- Any method of indicating is fine, like the occasional “from xxx” that you see on Scrapbox.
- By doing so, people who see it can easily trace the source.
- It’s considerate to both yourself and others.
-
When you don’t even know whose words they are,
- If you want to do it properly, you should write something like “I heard from someone that xxx,” but well, that’s a hassle.
-
Personally, I was wondering how much I can summarize information from books.
- Since books are often already organized systematically, I couldn’t help but think that summarizing information obtained from them is mostly just rehashing.
- Specifically, after reading Qiitaで記事を公開するときに気を付けるべきマナーについて 〜無断でネットや書籍の内容を丸写しするのはやめよう〜, I’ve been concerned about this.
- Hmm, yeah… (takker)
-
Mentioned links:
- 書籍で勉強した情報をどの程度まとめ直していいのか
- 横流し
- Lately, I often see articles being created in other Scrapbox projects as a result of what I wrote here.
- It’s not easy to notice, so I think inter-project links are necessary.
- cf. Webmentionに対応してほしい
- It seems feasible to implement it to find reverse links from projects in the watch list (takker).