pKineto#dialogue

  • I learned quite a lot from /blu3mo-private/未踏10/2報告FB.

  • Discussion on the timeline:

    • When people from the past collide with those in the present timeline,
      • Whether to prioritize people from the future in the present timeline.
    • Want to explore experiences unique to the timeline,
      • Such as pulling something together,
      • Maybe having game-like elements would be beneficial?
  • The key point is the back and forth between synchronous and pseudo-synchronous interactions.

    • It’s like navigating between synchronous and asynchronous.
  • It would be nice to have a way for instructors to have an overview of the entire timeline.

  • Doing spatial chat based on the timeline seems like a good idea.

  • Proposal for a teaching session by oneself.

  • Things to see:

    • Asking questions and then returning to see the answers.
  • Core: Ultimately, synchronous dialogue is an illusion.

    • The essence lies in the “feeling of being synchronous.”
    • I also wrote about this in Sense of Time Sharing.
    • Therefore, it’s important to create an experience that gives a sense of synchronization through UI and other means.
      • I was quite impressed by how Honk achieved this by sharing even while typing (blu3mo).
      • The same effect can be seen with sharing handwritten text (perhaps this is the reason for handwritten notes).
        • Or maybe I just want to copy Honk.
  • Drinami: Depending on whether you want to share emotions or information, the interface will vary.

    • (blu3mo) Currently, the focus seems to be on sharing information.
    • So, should it be made more useful for sharing information?
      • With pseudo-synchronization, since it’s not perfect synchronization, focusing on more ambiguous emotions might be better.
    • Emotions could also be effective.
  • It might be nice to have a feature where pressing a button allows you to jump to a different dimension to have synchronous discussions there.

  • Or rather, detailed discussions might be better off using a different channel (like Scrapbox or Zoom) instead of forcing it through Kineto.

    • The value lies in what is attached to the video, emphasizing communication in the moment (conveying emotions and light information).
    • In that case, a pathway to a different channel more suitable for complex discussions would be desired.
    • For example: https://twitter.com/ochyai/status/1347864732212944896
  • The issue of the front group not being able to see anything might be resolved by ensuring that what is written remains visible for a longer time.

    • What is written by people behind is like a time capsule from TENET reaching the future.
    • What is written by people from the future will reach those behind after a while.
    • (This phenomenon might not have been noticed without user testing).
    • (This discussion seems quite interesting in terms of the theme of “time” and could be a good topic for a presentation).
  • Yatsugoume Conference

    • It would be nice for instructors to be able to review later.
  • Kineto_Takamatsu-sensei MTG

    • It would be nice for instructors to be able to review later.
    • I feel like I was starting to forget the fundamental aspects of what makes synchronous and asynchronous teaching valuable, so it was good to be able to reaffirm that.
    • This is even before considering pseudo-synchronization.
  • There were many valuable discussions around this.

image image

  • Platforms like Line and Scrapbox conversations typically mix asynchronous and synchronous interactions, whereas here, it’s a blend of pseudo-synchronous and synchronous interactions.

    • It’s important to understand the essence of pseudo-synchronization.
    • This distinguishes it from video lessons with Docs.
    • It’s also crucial to understand where the assumption that pseudo-synchronization is better than asynchronous interactions comes into play.
      • There is a lot of joy in connections that aren’t immediately apparent.
  • In a way, isn’t the ultimate form of asynchrony a book?

    • It may not necessarily be the ultimate form; just one example.
  • As an interesting concept, diving into a sea of pseudo-synchronization entirely:

    • Not only students but teachers as well in the pseudo-synchronized sea
    • Furthermore, enabling educational materials to move along the timeline
    • The inspiration comes from the Actor Network Theory
  • Handwriting:

    • https://mm.hyuki.net/n/n34c00bdebb44?magazine_key=m73f865053b52
    • One way to address this is not just exchanging “information” through dialogue but also exchanging “meta-information” such as one’s feelings and understanding state.

    • Compared to chatting, Handwriting contains more meta-information
    • Also, having the consciousness of writing on videos seems to make it easier to understand the concept of kineto
      • Rather than associating with text, it’s more about adding annotations to videos and being aware of editing
    • Additionally, it has a high resolution in the time dimension

  • The following was written before 10/2

  • The medium is Kineto Video Notes:

    • Why?
    • If it’s not notes, it’s hard to create a purpose like “commenting” on NicoNico
    • It aligns with the existing concept of taking notes
  • There are dialogues among students driven by the teacher’s intention and dialogues that occur unintentionally

    • The latter includes casual conversations with neighbors during traditional classes
  • Difference between communication in chats, Google Docs, etc.:

    • It doesn’t remain on the screen forever
      • However, unlike video conversations, it’s possible to go back and review it
      • So what?
  • An experience where synchronous and pseudo-synchronous elements mix:

    • Communication based on the assumption that replies may not come back
      • Is there value in just writing something?
  • Why do this in the first place?

    • Wanting to have dialogues even in an environment where classes are taken asynchronously
    • The necessity of notes isn’t that high
      • Wouldn’t a NicoNico-style chat be better?
      • Are you still carrying over what you originally wanted to do?
  • Reasons why this isn’t NicoNico:

    • While NicoNico aims for a sense of unity, kineto focuses on dialogue/thought sharing (weak, right?)
    • It also allows synchronous dialogues (technically possible on NicoNico too)
    • Well, you should really have confidence in speed control
    • Also, pen annotations hold value
    • Addition: The greatest value lies in messages not just flowing but remaining in the space (being able to be preserved)
  • Issue of few people having pens:

    • Around 20% in schools
      • I think this is still an exceptional case
    • Gestures (markup) and key input could possibly replicate a similar experience
      • (Regarding inter-class dialogues)
      • Wait, is there a difference between inter-class dialogues and notes?
    • The pen brings joy:
      • Sensing the presence of others (important in communication)
      • Riding on the traditional media of “notes”
      • Engaging in inward information sharing through dialogue
    • If the pen is not essential, then it’s not a problem (lacking confidence in this)
  • Regarding online classes, it can be seen as a solution to the problem of the lack of inter-student dialogues online #kineto