(Note: I’m writing this casually based on my knowledge.)
-
I’m interested in the part about “Improving the Mechanism Rather Than Hitting Water.”
-
What does it mean for a situation to have no bugs?
- It means that Human bugs are covered.
- It means that the majority’s wishes are being fulfilled.
- Maybe when evaluating politics, there are “ideals (objectives)” and “competence (ability to achieve objectives),” but I think only the latter is the focal point.
- It’s difficult to draw a line between “objectives,” “bugs,” and “system.”
- Because a specific political system may be the objective, or the reason for having objectives may be a bug.
-
Type 1 (given after the name)
- It’s like populist politics or something.
- It’s about having the wrong parameters in elections.
- These explanations make sense, but they don’t explain the current political situation.
- If these bugs are significant, there should be a situation like “someone skilled at talking evades the issue of the coronavirus in press conferences, and the public doesn’t notice.”
- Hasn’t it become like that? I wonder.
- If these bugs are significant, there should be a situation like “someone skilled at talking evades the issue of the coronavirus in press conferences, and the public doesn’t notice.”
-
Type 2
- The media (referred to as the fourth estate) is not integrated into the system.
- This explanation seems to fit the current situation.
-
Type 3
- Problems that do not consider the timeline.
- → Silver Democracy